↓ Skip to main content

Iridoid glucosides substitution patterns inVerbenaceae and their taxonomic implication

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Iridoid glucosides substitution patterns inVerbenaceae and their taxonomic implication
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01464409
Authors

Gilsane Lino von Poser, Maria Elisa Toffoli, Marcos Sobral, Amélia T. Henriques

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Chemistry 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,644
of 30,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them