↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny inLabiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Phylogeny inLabiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, September 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf00985232
Authors

Steven J. Wagstaff, Laura Hickerson, Russ Spangler, Patrick A. Reeves, Richard G. Olmstead

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
Italy 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 59 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 53%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#122
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,589
of 31,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them