↓ Skip to main content

The large-scale landslide on the flank of caldera in South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The large-scale landslide on the flank of caldera in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Published in
Landslides, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10346-009-0143-x
Authors

Satoshi Tsuchiya, K. Sasahara, S. Shuin, S. Ozono

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Researcher 5 19%
Lecturer 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 52%
Engineering 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#213
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,018
of 172,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.