| Title |
Randomized rounding: A technique for provably good algorithms and algorithmic proofs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Combinatorica, December 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02579324 |
| Authors |
Prabhakar Raghavan, Clark D. Tompson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 43% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 56 | 53% |
| Engineering | 18 | 17% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,272,573
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#17
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,752
of 49,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them