You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Glick, Maria Lameiras, Susan T Fiske, Thomas Eckes, Barbara Masser, Chiara Volpato, Anna Maria Manganelli, Jolynn C X Pek, Li-Li Huang, Nuray Sakalli-Ugurlu, Yolanda Rodríguez Castro, Maria Luiza D'Avila Pereira, Tineke M Willemsen, Annetje Brunner, Iris Six-Materna, Robin Wells, Peter Glick |
| Abstract |
A 16-nation study involving 8,360 participants revealed that hostile and benevolent attitudes toward men, assessed by the Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (P. Click & S.T. Fiske, 1999), were (a) reliably measured across cultures, (b) positively correlated (for men and women, within samples and across nations) with each other and with hostile and benevolent sexism toward women (Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, P. Click & S.T. Fiske, 1996), and (c) negatively correlated with gender equality in cross-national comparisons. Stereotype measures indicated that men were viewed as having less positively valenced but more powerful traits than women. The authors argue that hostile as well as benevolent attitudes toward men reflect and support gender inequality by characterizing men as being designed for dominance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 14% |
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 61 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 198 | 55% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,089,109
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
#1,865
of 7,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,429
of 143,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
#31
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.