↓ Skip to main content

Antitermitic Activities of Abietane-type Diterpenes from Taxodium distichum Cones

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Antitermitic Activities of Abietane-type Diterpenes from Taxodium distichum Cones
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9646-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norihisa Kusumoto, Tatsuya Ashitani, Yuichi Hayasaka, Tetsuya Murayama, Koichi Ogiyama, Koetsu Takahashi

Abstract

Eight known abietane-type diterpenes were isolated from the weak acidic fraction of the n-hexane extract from cones of Taxodium distichum, one of the extant, living fossil conifers. They were identified as 6,7-dehydroroyleanone (1), taxodal (2), taxodione (3), salvinolone (4), 14-deoxycoleon U (5), 5,6-dehydrosugiol (6), sandaracopimaric acid (7), and xanthoperol (8). The structures of these compounds were determined by comparison of NMR spectral data with published data. The antitermitic (termicidal and antifeedant) activities of the compounds 1-8 against the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe, were evaluated. Compounds 1 and 3 showed potent termicidal activity, and 5 and 8 showed potent antifeedant activity. Compound 1 was found to be one of the representative bioactive compounds in the n-hexane extract of T. distichum cones. Compounds 1-8, with the exception of 7, were oxides of ferruginol (9). Therefore, the presence of various oxidation forms of the abietane-type structure reflects their various bioactivities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Chemistry 7 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,459,947
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#121
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,162
of 114,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.