↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the vertebrate Y RNA cluster

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the vertebrate Y RNA cluster
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12064-007-0003-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Mosig, Meng Guofeng, Bärbel M. R. Stadler, Peter F. Stadler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Materials Science 1 2%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#58
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,934
of 76,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.