↓ Skip to main content

Were arachnids the first to use combinatorial peptide libraries?

Overview of attention for article published in Regulatory Peptides, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Were arachnids the first to use combinatorial peptide libraries?
Published in
Regulatory Peptides, January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.07.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brianna L. Sollod, David Wilson, Olga Zhaxybayeva, J. Peter Gogarten, Roger Drinkwater, Glenn F. King

Abstract

Spiders, scorpions, and cone snails are remarkable for the extent and diversity of gene-encoded peptide neurotoxins that are expressed in their venom glands. These toxins are produced in the form of structurally constrained combinatorial peptide libraries in which there is hypermutation of essentially all residues in the mature-toxin sequence with the exception of a handful of strictly conserved cysteines that direct the three-dimensional fold of the toxin. This gene-based combinatorial peptide library strategy appears to have been first implemented by arachnids almost 400 million years ago, long before cone snails evolved a similar mechanism for generating peptide diversity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Australia 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 20 17%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 17%
Chemistry 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 20 17%