↓ Skip to main content

Applying an Equity Lens to Tobacco-Control Policies and Their Uptake in Six Western-European Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Applying an Equity Lens to Tobacco-Control Policies and Their Uptake in Six Western-European Countries
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, July 2007
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200132
Pubmed ID
Authors

K Giskes, A E Kunst, C Ariza, J Benach, C Borrell, U Helmert, K Judge, E Lahelma, K Moussa, P O Ostergren, K Patja, S Platt, R Pra̋tta̋la̋, M C Willemsen, J P Mackenbach

Abstract

We identified policies that may be effective in reducing smoking among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, and examined trends in their level of application between 1985 and 2000 in six western-European countries (Sweden, Finland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain). We located studies from literature searches in major databases, and acquired policy data from international data banks and questionnaires distributed to tobacco policy organisations/researchers. Advertising bans, smoking bans in workplaces, removing barriers to smoking cessation therapies, and increasing the cost of cigarettes have the potential to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in smoking. Between 1985 and 2000, tobacco control policies in most countries have become more targeted to decrease the smoking behaviour of low-socioeconomic groups. Despite this, many national tobacco-control strategies in western-European countries still fall short of a comprehensive policy approach to addressing smoking inequalities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Social Sciences 12 16%
Psychology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,839,453
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#126
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,257
of 76,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them