↓ Skip to main content

A large dacitic lava flow in northern chile

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, September 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A large dacitic lava flow in northern chile
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, September 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf02596749
Authors

J. E. Guest, J. Sánchez R

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 80%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#387
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#559
of 2,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them