↓ Skip to main content

Population structure and breeding biology of Pisidia longicornis and Porcellana platycheles

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, November 1972
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Population structure and breeding biology of Pisidia longicornis and Porcellana platycheles
Published in
Marine Biology, November 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00347308
Authors

G. Smaldon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Greece 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 43%
Environmental Science 5 18%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#816
of 3,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.