↓ Skip to main content

A review of the Tetrarhynchobothriidae Dollfus, 1969 (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) with descriptions of two new genera, Didymorhynchus and Zygorhynchus

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Parasitology, July 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A review of the Tetrarhynchobothriidae Dollfus, 1969 (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) with descriptions of two new genera, Didymorhynchus and Zygorhynchus
Published in
Systematic Parasitology, July 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00182025
Authors

Ian Beveridge, Ronald A. Campbell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 11%
Russia 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Professor 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 78%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#149
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,781
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them