↓ Skip to main content

Frequency-dependent success of aggressive mimics in a cleaning symbiosis

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency-dependent success of aggressive mimics in a cleaning symbiosis
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2005
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2005.3256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen L Cheney, Isabelle M Ct

Abstract

Batesian mimics--palatable organisms that resemble unpalatable ones--are usually maintained in populations by frequency-dependent selection. We tested whether this mechanism was also responsible for the maintenance of aggressive mimicry in natural populations of coral reef fishes. The attack success of bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos), which mimic juvenile bluestreaked cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus) in colour but tear flesh and scales from fishes instead of removing ectoparasites, was frequency-dependent, increasing as mimics became rarer relative to their model. However, cleaner mimics were also more successful on reefs with higher densities of potential victims, perhaps because a dilution-like effect creates few opportunities for potential victims to learn to avoid mimics. Further studies should reveal whether this second mechanism is specific to aggressive mimicry.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 86 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 72%
Environmental Science 11 11%
Psychology 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,147
of 11,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,367
of 71,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#51
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.