↓ Skip to main content

Genomewide Association Analysis of Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
16 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1802 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomewide Association Analysis of Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2007
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa072366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilesh J Samani, Jeanette Erdmann, Alistair S Hall, Christian Hengstenberg, Massimo Mangino, Bjoern Mayer, Richard J Dixon, Thomas Meitinger, Peter Braund, H-Erich Wichmann, Jennifer H Barrett, Inke R König, Suzanne E Stevens, Silke Szymczak, David-Alexandre Tregouet, Mark M Iles, Friedrich Pahlke, Helen Pollard, Wolfgang Lieb, Francois Cambien, Marcus Fischer, Willem Ouwehand, Stefan Blankenberg, Anthony J Balmforth, Andrea Baessler, Stephen G Ball, Tim M Strom, Ingrid Braenne, Christian Gieger, Panos Deloukas, Martin D Tobin, Andreas Ziegler, John R Thompson, Heribert Schunkert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 594 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 143 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 21%
Student > Master 56 9%
Student > Bachelor 50 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 7%
Other 117 19%
Unknown 92 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 105 17%
Computer Science 21 3%
Mathematics 16 3%
Other 66 10%
Unknown 114 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,515,258
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#11,876
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,746
of 79,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#44
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.