↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Evaluation of Verification and Validation Tools on Martian Rover Software

Overview of attention for article published in Formal Methods in System Design, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Experimental Evaluation of Verification and Validation Tools on Martian Rover Software
Published in
Formal Methods in System Design, September 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:form.0000040027.28662.a4
Authors

Guillaume Brat, Doron Drusinsky, Dimitra Giannakopoulou, Allen Goldberg, Klaus Havelund, Mike Lowry, Corina Pasareanu, Arnaud Venet, Willem Visser, Rich Washington

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 47 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 35%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 54%
Engineering 13 23%
Psychology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Formal Methods in System Design
#6
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,035
of 69,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Formal Methods in System Design
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them