↓ Skip to main content

Responses of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) to water table depth and soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta, China

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Responses of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) to water table depth and soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta, China
Published in
Plant Ecology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11258-010-9723-z
Authors

Baoshan Cui, Qichun Yang, Kejiang Zhang, Xinsheng Zhao, Zheyuan You

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 37%
Environmental Science 8 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#216
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,953
of 165,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.