↓ Skip to main content

Species limits and population differentiation in New Zealand snipes (Scolopacidae: Coenocorypha)

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Species limits and population differentiation in New Zealand snipes (Scolopacidae: Coenocorypha)
Published in
Conservation Genetics, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10592-009-9965-2
Authors

Allan J. Baker, Colin M. Miskelly, Oliver Haddrath

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 6%
Guatemala 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,749,471
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#479
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,896
of 107,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.