↓ Skip to main content

Evolution and Diversification of RNA Silencing Proteins in Fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
14 patents
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Evolution and Diversification of RNA Silencing Proteins in Fungi
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00239-005-0257-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hitoshi Nakayashiki, Naoki Kadotani, Shigeyuki Mayama

Abstract

Comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of fungal Argonaute, Dicer, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-like proteins have been performed to gain insights into the diversification of RNA silencing pathways during the evolution of fungi. A wide range of fungi including ascomycetes, basidiomycetyes, and zygomycetes possesses multiple RNA silencing components in the genome, whereas a portion of ascomycete and basidiomycete fungi apparently lacks the whole or most of the components. The number of paralogous silencing proteins in the genome differs considerably among fungal species, suggesting that RNA silencing pathways have diversified significantly during evolution in parallel with developing the complexity of life cycle or in response to environmental conditions. Interestingly, orthologous silencing proteins from different fungal clades are often clustered more closely than paralogous proteins in a fungus, indicating that duplication events occurred before speciation events. Therefore, the origin of multiple RNA silencing pathways seems to be very ancient, likely having occurred prior to the divergence of the major fungal lineages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 26%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,696,560
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#238
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,803
of 52,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them