↓ Skip to main content

Feeding ecology ofBranchinecta gaini (Crustacea: Anostraca) in ponds of South Shetland Islands, Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Feeding ecology ofBranchinecta gaini (Crustacea: Anostraca) in ponds of South Shetland Islands, Antarctica
Published in
Polar Biology, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01876824
Authors

J. C. Paggi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 17%
Czechia 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 50%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#598
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,764
of 79,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.