Title |
Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trends in Hearing, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1177/2331216516670387 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua G. W. Bernstein, Henrik Danielsson, Mathias Hällgren, Stefan Stenfelt, Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner |
Abstract |
The audiogram predicts <30% of the variance in speech-reception thresholds (SRTs) for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners fitted with individualized frequency-dependent gain. The remaining variance could reflect suprathreshold distortion in the auditory pathways or nonauditory factors such as cognitive processing. The relationship between a measure of suprathreshold auditory function-spectrotemporal modulation (STM) sensitivity-and SRTs in noise was examined for 154 HI listeners fitted with individualized frequency-specific gain. SRTs were measured for 65-dB SPL sentences presented in speech-weighted noise or four-talker babble to an individually programmed master hearing aid, with the output of an ear-simulating coupler played through insert earphones. Modulation-depth detection thresholds were measured over headphones for STM (2cycles/octave density, 4-Hz rate) applied to an 85-dB SPL, 2-kHz lowpass-filtered pink-noise carrier. SRTs were correlated with both the high-frequency (2-6 kHz) pure-tone average (HFA; R(2 )= .31) and STM sensitivity (R(2 )= .28). Combined with the HFA, STM sensitivity significantly improved the SRT prediction (ΔR(2 )= .13; total R(2 )= .44). The remaining unaccounted variance might be attributable to variability in cognitive function and other dimensions of suprathreshold distortion. STM sensitivity was most critical in predicting SRTs for listeners < 65 years old or with HFA <53 dB HL. Results are discussed in the context of previous work suggesting that STM sensitivity for low rates and low-frequency carriers is impaired by a reduced ability to use temporal fine-structure information to detect dynamic spectra. STM detection is a fast test of suprathreshold auditory function for frequencies <2 kHz that complements the HFA to predict variability in hearing-aid outcomes for speech perception in noise. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
Researcher | 17 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 16% |
Psychology | 12 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 21% |