↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the correlation between wastewater analysis and roadside drug testing in South Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Drug & Alcohol Dependence, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the correlation between wastewater analysis and roadside drug testing in South Australia
Published in
Drug & Alcohol Dependence, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Bade, Benjamin J Tscharke, Marie Longo, Richard Cooke, Jason M White, Cobus Gerber

Abstract

The societal impact of drug use is well known. An example is when drug-intoxicated drivers increase the burden on policing and healthcare services. This work presents the correlation of wastewater analysis (using UHPLC-MS/MS) and positive roadside drug testing results for methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and cannabis from December 2011-December 2016 in South Australia. Methamphetamine and MDMA showed similar trends between the data sources with matching increases and decreases, respectively. Cannabis was relatively steady based on wastewater analysis, but the roadside drug testing data started to diverge in the final part of the measurement period. The ability to triangulate data as shown here validates both wastewater analysis and roadside drug testing. This suggests that changes in overall population drug use revealed by WWA is consistent and proportional with changes in drug-driving behaviours. The results show that, at higher levels of drug use as measured by wastewater analysis, there is an increase in drug driving in the community and therefore more strain on health services and police.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 12 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Drug & Alcohol Dependence
#4,763
of 6,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,411
of 343,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug & Alcohol Dependence
#95
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.