↓ Skip to main content

Automatic prediction of protein function

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Automatic prediction of protein function
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00018-003-3114-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Rost, J. Liu, R. Nair, K. O. Wrzeszczynski, Y. Ofran

Abstract

Most methods annotating protein function utilise sequence homology to proteins of experimentally known function. Such a homology-based annotation transfer is problematic and limited in scope. Therefore, computational biologists have begun to develop ab initio methods that predict aspects of function, including subcellular localization, post-translational modifications, functional type and protein-protein interactions. For the first two cases, the most accurate approaches rely on identifying short signalling motifs, while the most general methods utilise tools of artificial intelligence. An outstanding new method predicts classes of cellular function directly from sequence. Similarly, promising methods have been developed predicting protein-protein interaction partners at acceptable levels of accuracy for some pairs in entire proteomes. No matter how difficult the task, successes over the last few years have clearly paved the way for ab initio prediction of protein function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 133 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Professor 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 23%
Computer Science 19 12%
Engineering 5 3%
Mathematics 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,083
of 6,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,620
of 146,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.