↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the trypanosome flagellar proteome using a combined electron transfer/collisionally activated dissociation strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the trypanosome flagellar proteome using a combined electron transfer/collisionally activated dissociation strategy
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.08.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R. Hart, King Wai Lau, Zhiqi Hao, Richard Broadhead, Neil Portman, Andreas Hühmer, Keith Gull, Paul G. McKean, Simon J. Hubbard, Simon J. Gaskell

Abstract

The use of electron-transfer dissociation as an alternative peptide ion activation method for generation of protein sequence information is examined here in comparison with the conventional method of choice, collisionally activated dissociation, using a linear ion trapping instrument. Direct comparability between collisionally and electron-transfer-activated product ion data were ensured by employing an activation-switching method during acquisition, sequentially activating precisely the same precursor ion species with each fragmentation method in turn. Sequest (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) searching of product ion data generated an overlapping yet distinct pool of polypeptide identifications from the products of collisional and electron-transfer-mediated activation products. To provide a highly confident set of protein recognitions, identification data were filtered using parameters that achieved a peptide false discovery rate of 1%, with two or more independent peptide assignments required for each protein. The use of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) has allowed us to identify additional peptides where the quality of product ion data generated by collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) was insufficient to infer peptide sequence. Thus, a combined ETD/CAD approach leads to the recognition of more peptides and proteins than are achieved using peptide analysis by CAD- or ETD-based tandem mass spectrometry alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Netherlands 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,227
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,829
of 245,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#65
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.