↓ Skip to main content

In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00018-005-5527-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Kramer, F. Böhrnsen, U. Lindner, P. Behrens, P. Schlenke, J. Rohwedel

Abstract

Microfracture of subchondral bone results in intrinsic repair of cartilage defects. Stem or progenitor cells from bone marrow have been proposed to be involved in this regenerative process. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that mesenchymal stem (MS) cells can in fact be recovered from matrix material saturated with cells from bone marrow after microfracture. This also introduces a new technique for MS cell isolation during arthroscopic treatment. MS cells were phenotyped using specific cell surface antibodies. Differentiation of the MS cells into the adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic lineage could be demonstrated by cultivation of MS cells as a monolayer, as micromass bodies or mesenchymal microspheres. This study demonstrates that MS cells can be attracted to a cartilage defect by guidance of a collagenous matrix after perforating subchondral bone. Protocols for application of MS cells in restoration of cartilage tissue include an initial invasive biopsy to obtain the MS cells and time-wasting in vitro proliferation and possibly differentiation of the cells before implantation. The new technique already includes attraction of MS cells to sites of cartilage defects and therefore may overcome the necessity of in vitro proliferation and differentiation of MS cells prior to transplantation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Engineering 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,474,130
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#623
of 5,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,689
of 71,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.