↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Photosynthetic Strategy for Adaptation to Low-Iron Aquatic Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Photosynthetic Strategy for Adaptation to Low-Iron Aquatic Environments
Published in
Biochemistry, January 2011
DOI 10.1021/bi1009425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devendra Chauhan, I. Mihaela Folea, Craig C. Jolley, Roman Kouřil, Carolyn E. Lubner, Su Lin, Dorota Kolber, Felisa Wolfe-Simon, John H. Golbeck, Egbert J. Boekema, Petra Fromme

Abstract

Iron (Fe) availability is a major limiting factor for primary production in aquatic environments. Cyanobacteria respond to Fe deficiency by derepressing the isiAB operon, which encodes the antenna protein IsiA and flavodoxin. At nanomolar Fe concentrations, a PSI-IsiA supercomplex forms, comprising a PSI trimer encircled by two complete IsiA rings. This PSI-IsiA supercomplex is the largest photosynthetic membrane protein complex yet isolated. This study presents a detailed characterization of this complex using transmission electron microscopy and ultrafast fluorescence spectroscopy. Excitation trapping and electron transfer are highly efficient, allowing cyanobacteria to avoid oxidative stress. This mechanism may be a major factor used by cyanobacteria to successfully adapt to modern low-Fe environments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 7%
Chemistry 4 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,869,909
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#1,170
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,808
of 189,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.