↓ Skip to main content

NRAGE, a p75 Neurotrophin Receptor-interacting Protein, Induces Caspase Activation and Cell Death through a JNK-dependent Mitochondrial Pathway*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NRAGE, a p75 Neurotrophin Receptor-interacting Protein, Induces Caspase Activation and Cell Death through a JNK-dependent Mitochondrial Pathway*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, October 2002
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m205324200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir H. Salehi, Steven Xanthoudakis, Philip A. Barker

Abstract

The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) mediates signaling events leading to activation of the JNK pathway and cell death in a variety of cell types. We recently identified NRAGE, a protein that directly interacts with the p75NTR cytosolic region and facilitates p75NTR-mediated cell death. For the present study, we developed an inducible recombinant NRAGE adenovirus to dissect the mechanism of NRAGE-mediated apoptosis. Induced NRAGE expression resulted in robust activation of the JNK pathway that was not inhibited by the pharmacological mixed lineage kinase (MLK) inhibitor CEP1347. NRAGE induced cytosolic accumulation of cytochrome c, activation of Caspases-3, -9 and -7, and caspase-dependent cell death. Blocking JNK and c-Jun action by overexpression of the JNK-binding domain of JIP1 or dominant-negative c-Jun ablated NRAGE-mediated caspase activation and NRAGE-induced cell death. These findings identify NRAGE as a p75NTR interactor capable of inducing caspase activation and cell death through a JNK-dependent mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#32,957
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,561
of 50,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#403
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.