↓ Skip to main content

WebQTL

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
WebQTL
Published in
Neuroinformatics, January 2003
DOI 10.1385/ni:1:4:299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jintao Wang, Robert W. Williams, Kenneth F. Manly

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 50 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 16%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#157
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,675
of 136,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.