↓ Skip to main content

Applications of particle-tracking techniques to bank infiltration: a case study from El Paso, Texas, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Applications of particle-tracking techniques to bank infiltration: a case study from El Paso, Texas, USA
Published in
Environmental Geology, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00254-007-0996-z
Authors

Ahmad Abdel-Fattah, Richard Langford, Dirk Schulze-Makuch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 25%
Engineering 6 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#67
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,543
of 67,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.