| Title |
Parataxonomy vs. taxonomy in biodiversity studies – pitfalls and applicability of ‘morphospecies’ sorting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:bioc.0000011727.53780.63 |
| Authors |
Frank-Thorsten Krell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 12 | 2% |
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 4% |
| Unknown | 478 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 144 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 9% |
| Professor | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 358 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 80 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 57 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,861,905
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#410
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,386
of 64,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.