↓ Skip to main content

Psychomotor stimulant effects of methylxanthines in squirrel monkeys: relation to adenosine antagonism

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, May 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Psychomotor stimulant effects of methylxanthines in squirrel monkeys: relation to adenosine antagonism
Published in
Psychopharmacology, May 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00212759
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. D. Spealman

Abstract

The behavioral effects of six methylxanthines were studied in squirrel monkeys responding under a fixed-interval (FI) schedule of stimulus-shock termination. Dose-response curves were determined for each drug by administering cumulative doses IV during timeout periods that preceded sequential components of the FI schedule. Low to intermediate doses of caffeine, theophylline, 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT), 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) produced dose-related increases in response rate, whereas higher doses increased response rate less or decreased it. Enprofylline did not increase response rate at any dose. Pretreatment with a high dose of the adenosine agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine (NECA) suppressed responding throughout the experimental session. Caffeine, theophylline, 8-PT, CPT, and IBMX, but not enprofylline, antagonized the suppressant effects of NECA in a dose-related manner. The potencies of the methylxanthines for increasing response rate under the FI schedule were positively correlated with their potencies for antagonizing the suppressant effects of NECA, suggesting that the psychomotor stimulant effects of methylxanthines are linked to their antagonistic actions at adenosine recognition sites. CPT, which in vitro has much higher affinity (greater than 10(3)-fold) than caffeine for adenosine A1, but not for A2, recognition sites, was only 3-6 times more potent than caffeine in increasing response rate or in antagonizing the effects of NECA. The psychomotor stimulant effects of methylxanthines therefore appear to be more closely associated with antagonism at adenosine A2 than adenosine A1 recognition sites.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,166
of 5,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,840
of 13,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.