↓ Skip to main content

Low δ18O silicic volcanic rocks at the Calabozos caldera complex, southern Andes

Overview of attention for article published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Low δ18O silicic volcanic rocks at the Calabozos caldera complex, southern Andes
Published in
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00518031
Authors

Anita L. Grunder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 89%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#199
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,223
of 11,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them