↓ Skip to main content

Nephrolithiasis related to inborn metabolic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Nephrolithiasis related to inborn metabolic diseases
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00467-008-1085-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Cochat, Valérie Pichault, Justine Bacchetta, Laurence Dubourg, Jean-François Sabot, Christine Saban, Michel Daudon, Aurélia Liutkus

Abstract

Nephrolithiasis associated with inborn metabolic diseases is a very rare condition with some common characteristics: early onset of symptoms, family history, associated tubular impairment, bilateral, multiple and recurrent stones, and association with nephrocalcinosis. The prognosis of such diseases may lead to life threatening conditions, not only because of unabated kidney damage but also because of progressive extra-renal involvement, either in a systemic form (e.g. primary hyperoxaluria type 1, requiring combined liver and kidney transplantation), or in a neurological form (Lesch-Nyhan syndrome leading to auto-mutilation and disability, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase superactivity, which is associated with mental retardation). Patients with other inborn metabolic diseases present only with recurrent stone formation, such as cystinuria, adenine phosphoribosyl-transferase deficiency, xanthine deficiency. Finally, nephrolithiasis may be secondarily part of some other metabolic diseases, such as glycogen storage disease type 1 or inborn errors of metabolism leading to Fanconi syndrome (nephropathic cystinosis, tyrosinaemia type 1, fructose intolerance, Wilson disease, respiratory chain disorders, etc.). The diagnosis is based on highly specific investigations, including crystal identification, biochemical analyses and DNA study. The treatment of nephrolithiasis requires hydration as well as specific measures. Compliance is a major issue regarding the progression of renal damage, but the overall outcome mainly depends on extra-renal involvement in relation to the metabolic defect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 31 25%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,485
of 3,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,504
of 170,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,537 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.