| Title |
A comparison of early Neolithic crop and weed assemblages from the Linearbandkeramik and the Bulgarian Neolithic cultures: differences and similarities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00334-005-0080-0 |
| Authors |
Angela Kreuz, Elena Marinova, Eva Schäfer, Julian Wiethold |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 29 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#190
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,046
of 59,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.