↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacologic Therapy of Ocular Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 36: Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pharmacology
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pharmacology
Chapter number 36
Book title
Pharmacologic Therapy of Ocular Disease
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/164_2016_36
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-958288-7, 978-3-31-958290-0
Authors

Charles B. Wright, Jayakrishna Ambati, Wright, Charles B., Ambati, Jayakrishna

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the most common form of irreversible blindness in the industrially developed world, can present years before a patient begins to lose vision. For most of these patients, AMD never progresses past its early stages to the advanced forms that are principally responsible for the vast majority of vision loss. Advanced AMD can manifest as either an advanced avascular form known as geographic atrophy (GA) marked by regional retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell death or as an advanced form known as neovascular AMD marked by the intrusion of fragile new blood vessels into the normally avascular retina. Physicians have several therapeutic interventions available to combat neovascular AMD, but GA has no approved effective therapies as of yet. In this chapter, we will discuss the current strategies for limiting dry AMD in patients. We will also discuss previous attempts at pharmacological intervention that were tested in a clinical setting and consider reasons why these putative therapeutics did not perform successfully in large-scale trials. Despite the number of unsuccessful past trials, new pharmacological interventions may succeed. These future therapies may aid millions of AMD patients worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 26 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,601,965
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#505
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,708
of 394,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.