↓ Skip to main content

Activity-based therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Activity-based therapies
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander W. Dromerick, Peter S. Lum, Joseph Hidler

Abstract

Therapeutic activity is a mainstay of clinical neurorehabilitation, but is typically unstructured and directed at compensation rather than restoration of central nervous system function. Newer activity-based therapies (ABTs) are in early stages of development and testing. The ABTs attempt to restore function via standardized therapeutic activity based on principles of experimental psychology, exercise physiology, and neuroscience. Three of the best developed ABTs are constraint-induced therapy, robotic therapy directed at the hemiplegic arm, and treadmill training techniques aimed at improving gait in persons with stroke and spinal cord injury. These treatments appear effective in improving arm function and gait, but they have not yet been clearly demonstrated to be more effective than equal amounts of traditional techniques. Resistance training is clearly demonstrated to improve strength in persons with stroke and brain injury, and most studies show that it does not increase hypertonia. Clinical trials of ABTs face several methodological challenges. These challenges include defining dosage, standardizing treatment parameters across subjects and within treatment sessions, and determining what constitutes clinically significant treatment effects. The long-term goal is to develop prescriptive ABT, where specific activities are proven to treat specific motor system disorders. Activity-based therapies are not a cure, but are likely to play an important role in future treatment cocktails for stroke and spinal cord injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Engineering 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 35 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#771
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,175
of 187,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.