↓ Skip to main content

Pollination and Resource Constraints on Fruit Set and Fruit Size of Persoonia rigida (Proteaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pollination and Resource Constraints on Fruit Set and Fruit Size of Persoonia rigida (Proteaceae)
Published in
Annals of Botany, February 1999
DOI 10.1006/anbo.1998.0799
Authors

S. J. TRUEMAN, H. M. WALLACE

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 5%
Norway 1 3%
France 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 31 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 73%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#2,387
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,693
of 102,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.