↓ Skip to main content

Information available In brief tactile presentations

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 1966
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Information available In brief tactile presentations
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 1966
DOI 10.3758/bf03207391
Authors

James C. Bliss, Hewitt D. Crane, Phyllis K. Mansfield, James T. Townsend

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 31%
Engineering 6 14%
Computer Science 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,552,629
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#318
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them