↓ Skip to main content

Risk assessment of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L), in New Zealand based on phenology modelling

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Risk assessment of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L), in New Zealand based on phenology modelling
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00484-006-0066-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel Peter William Pitt, Jacques Régnière, Sue Worner

Abstract

The gypsy moth is a global pest that has not yet established in New Zealand despite individual moths having been discovered near ports. A climate-driven phenology model previously used in North America was applied to New Zealand. Weather and elevation data were used as inputs to predict where sustainable populations could potentially exist and predict the timing of hatch and oviposition in different regions. Results for New Zealand were compared with those in the Canadian Maritimes (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island) where the gypsy moth has long been established. Model results agree with the current distribution of the gypsy moth in the Canadian Maritimes and predict that the majority of New Zealand's North Island and the northern coastal regions of the South Island have a suitable climate to allow stable seasonality of the gypsy moth. New Zealand's climate appears more forgiving than that of the Canadian Maritimes, as the model predicts a wider range of oviposition dates leading to stable seasonality. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of climate change on the predicted potential distribution for New Zealand. Climate change scenarios show an increase in probability of establishment throughout New Zealand, most noticeably in the South Island.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 49%
Environmental Science 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#673
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,399
of 155,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.