↓ Skip to main content

How good are interior point methods? Klee–Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Programming, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
How good are interior point methods? Klee–Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds
Published in
Mathematical Programming, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10107-006-0044-x
Authors

Antoine Deza, Eissa Nematollahi, Tamás Terlaky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 35%
Mathematics 5 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 13%
Computer Science 2 9%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,258,597
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#101
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,835
of 79,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.