↓ Skip to main content

Gold metallizations for eutectic bonding of silicon wafers

Overview of attention for article published in Microsystem Technologies, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Gold metallizations for eutectic bonding of silicon wafers
Published in
Microsystem Technologies, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00542-006-0228-6
Authors

S. Lani, A. Bosseboeuf, B. Belier, C. Clerc, C. Gousset, J. Aubert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 38%
Researcher 14 31%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 38%
Materials Science 11 24%
Physics and Astronomy 10 22%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Microsystem Technologies
#138
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,122
of 88,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microsystem Technologies
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.