↓ Skip to main content

Methoden zur Darstellung von 4-Azido-2(1H)-chinolonen

Overview of attention for article published in Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, November 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,161)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Methoden zur Darstellung von 4-Azido-2(1H)-chinolonen
Published in
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly, November 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00810876
Authors

Wolfgang Stadlbauer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2011.
All research outputs
#3,469,259
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#22
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#676
of 11,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them