| Title |
The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-008-1323-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikhail N. Koffarnus, Benjamin Greedy, Stephen M. Husbands, Peter Grundt, Amy Hauck Newman, James H. Woods |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,099
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,490
of 87,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.