↓ Skip to main content

Effect of fungal metabolite peramine and analogs on feeding and development of argentine stem weevil (Listronotus bonariensis)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Effect of fungal metabolite peramine and analogs on feeding and development of argentine stem weevil (Listronotus bonariensis)
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01014100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daryl D. Rowan, Jenny J. Dymock, Margaret A. Brimble

Abstract

Peramine, a pyrrolopyrazine alkaloid produced by the fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrassAcremonium lolii, deterred the feeding of both adults and larvae of the graminacious herbivore, the Argentine stem weevil (Listronotus bonariensis), at 0.1 μg/g and 10 μg/g, respectively. In a no-choice test fewer stem weevil larvae fed and developed on diet containing as little as 2 μg/g peramine. The proportion of larvae which did not develop beyond the first instar was higher on diet containing peramine and appeared to be due to a higher proportion of larvae which did not feed. For larvae which fed on the peramine-containing diet, feeding scores and times to pupation were not significantly different from those of controls. A number of simple peramine analogues showed feeding-deterrent activity against adult weevils, indicating the importance of the pyrrolopyrazine ring system of peramine in determining feeding-deterrent activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 39%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 44%
Chemistry 3 17%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,696,781
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#300
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,954
of 16,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.