| Title |
Starch grain analysis as a Microscopic Diagnostic Feature in the Identification of Plant Material
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02908212 |
| Authors |
A. R. Cortella, M. L. Pochettino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 29% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#273
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,644
of 22,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.