↓ Skip to main content

Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications
Published in
Planta, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00425-004-1307-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Punyasloke Bhadury, Phillip C. Wright

Abstract

Marine algae are one of the largest producers of biomass in the marine environment. They produce a wide variety of chemically active metabolites in their surroundings, potentially as an aid to protect themselves against other settling organisms. These active metabolites, also known as biogenic compounds, produced by several species of marine macro- and micro-algae, have antibacterial, antialgal, antimacrofouling and antifungal properties, which are effective in the prevention of biofouling, and have other likely uses, e.g. in therapeutics. The isolated substances with potent antifouling activity belong to groups of fatty acids, lipopeptides, amides, alkaloids, terpenoids, lactones, pyrroles and steroids. These biogenic compounds have the potential to be produced commercially using metabolic engineering techniques. Therefore, isolation of biogenic compounds and determination of their structure could provide leads for future development of, for example, environmentally friendly antifouling paints. This paper mainly discusses the successes of such research, and the future applications in the context of understanding the systems biology of micro-algae and cyanobacteria.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 378 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 22%
Researcher 83 21%
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 49 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 172 43%
Environmental Science 37 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 8%
Chemistry 31 8%
Engineering 21 5%
Other 54 13%
Unknown 54 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,752,673
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#208
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,474
of 54,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.