↓ Skip to main content

Community Capacity for Adaptation to Climate-Induced Water Shortages: Linking Institutional Complexity and Local Actors

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Chapter title
Community Capacity for Adaptation to Climate-Induced Water Shortages: Linking Institutional Complexity and Local Actors
Published in
Environmental Management, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0014-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet L. Ivey, John Smithers, Rob C. de Loë, Reid D. Kreutzwiser

Abstract

There is growing concern for the capacity of urban and rural communities to manage current water shortages and to prepare for shortages that may accompany predicted changes in climate. In this paper, concepts relating to the notion of climate adaptation and particularly "capacity building" are used to elucidate several determinants of community-level capacity for water management. These concepts and criteria are then used to interpret empirically derived insights relating to local management of water shortages in Ontario, Canada. General determinants of water-related community capacity relate to upper tier political and institutional arrangements; the characteristics of, and relationships among, pertinent agencies, groups, or individuals involved in water management; and the adequacy of financial, human, information, and technical resources. The case analysis illustrates how general factors play out in local experience. The findings point to geographically specific factors that influence the effectiveness of management. Key factors include collaboration between water managers, clarification of agency roles and responsibilities, integration of water management and land-use planning, and recognition and participation of both urban and rural stakeholders, whose sensitivities to water shortages are spatially and temporally variable.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 229 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Researcher 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 34%
Social Sciences 55 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Engineering 14 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 4%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 39 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,944,207
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#196
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,197
of 151,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.