↓ Skip to main content

Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
448 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees
Published in
Oecologia, July 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1624-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. S. Santiago, G. Goldstein, F. C. Meinzer, J. B. Fisher, K. Machado, D. Woodruff, T. Jones

Abstract

We investigated how water transport capacity, wood density and wood anatomy were related to leaf photosynthetic traits in two lowland forests in Panama. Leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity ( k(L)) of upper branches was positively correlated with maximum rates of net CO(2) assimilation per unit leaf area ( A(area)) and stomatal conductance ( g(s)) across 20 species of canopy trees. Maximum k(L) showed stronger correlation with A(area) than initial k(L) suggesting that allocation to photosynthetic potential is proportional to maximum water transport capacity. Terminal branch k(L) was negatively correlated with A(area)/ g(s) and positively correlated with photosynthesis per unit N, indicating a trade-off of efficient use of water against efficient use of N in photosynthesis as water transport efficiency varied. Specific hydraulic conductivity calculated from xylem anatomical characteristics ( k(theoretical)) was positively related to A(area) and k(L), consistent with relationships among physiological measurements. Branch wood density was negatively correlated with wood water storage at saturation, k(L), A(area), net CO(2) assimilation per unit leaf mass ( A(mass)), and minimum leaf water potential measured on covered leaves, suggesting that wood density constrains physiological function to specific operating ranges. Kinetic and static indices of branch water transport capacity thus exhibit considerable co-ordination with allocation to potential carbon gain. Our results indicate that understanding tree hydraulic architecture provides added insights to comparisons of leaf level measurements among species, and links photosynthetic allocation patterns with branch hydraulic processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Brazil 5 <1%
Argentina 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 585 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 18%
Student > Master 93 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 7%
Other 128 21%
Unknown 82 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 341 55%
Environmental Science 144 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 3%
Unspecified 4 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 97 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,669
of 53,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.