↓ Skip to main content

Influence of age on dynamic position sense: evidence using a sequential movement task

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Influence of age on dynamic position sense: evidence using a sequential movement task
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00221-004-2208-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sangeetha Madhavan, Richard K. Shields

Abstract

Age related changes to the nervous system are well documented. The main objectives of this study were to examine age-associated changes in dynamic position sense and relate these changes to measures of balance and physical function. Two groups of individuals (young <30 years; elderly >60 years) performed an upper extremity movement sequence triggered by a pre-determined target angle during passive rotations of the ankle joint at ten random velocities (10-90 degrees s(-1)). Balance was assessed with a series of timed standing tests. Physical function was assessed with the SF 36 questionnaire. Muscle activity was recorded from the ankle dorsiflexors and plantarflexors during the dynamic position tests. Increased error in the elderly group suggested that dynamic position sense declines with age. Moreover, this decline in dynamic position sense was associated with decreased balance and an impaired perception of physical function. The elderly also co-contracted the ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during the proprioceptive testing, perhaps as a strategy to "gain up" spindle sensitivity. These findings suggest that impaired dynamic position sense of the ankle contributes to alterations in the overall physical function and balance in the elderly. Rehabilitative training methods that improve dynamic position sense of the ankles may improve physical function and balance in the elderly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Sports and Recreations 15 17%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,537
of 70,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.