↓ Skip to main content

How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Central European Journal of Operations Research, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study
Published in
Central European Journal of Operations Research, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10100-006-0012-9
Authors

Alessio Ishizaka, Markus Lusti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 34 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 16%
Computer Science 13 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Decision Sciences 5 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Central European Journal of Operations Research
#10
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,267
of 69,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Central European Journal of Operations Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them