↓ Skip to main content

Die Arbeitsweise des Bauchsaugnapfes digenetischer Trematoden am Beispiel desDicrocoelium dendriticum

Overview of attention for article published in Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Die Arbeitsweise des Bauchsaugnapfes digenetischer Trematoden am Beispiel desDicrocoelium dendriticum
Published in
Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, January 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00932918
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter Neuhaus

Abstract

The suckers of animals adhere to the substratum either in air or in aqueous fluids. The varying compressibility of these media causes differences in function, the principles of which are described. The ventral arch of the acetabulum of Dicrocoelium dendriticum, like the remaining body, is limited by the integument, basal lamina and skin muscles. The dorsal arch covers a basal lamina, which is close to a plexus of diagonal, longitudinal and circular muscles. The radical muscles, attached at the ventral basal lamina by thin connective tissue, continue in relatively thick contractile fibers, which split up into several fibrils, which also attached by thin connective tissue at the dorsal basal lamina. In this way the tension of the muscles is likewise distributed over the dorsal and ventral arches of the acetabulum. After contact with the substratum the sucker creates a partial vacuum and attachment by means of the pressure of the radial muscles against the wall of the hole. Because of the fluid content of the hole, the volume does not change much. The dorsal arch of the sucker withstands the pressure of the radical muscles, because its surface area is six times greater than that of the ventral arch and consequently the load is six times less. The sucker, covered with basal lamina, has a constant volume; its layer of muscles resists deformation and supports the stability of the arch.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
#16
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,392
of 39,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them